<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: coming soon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antonolsen.com/2005/04/10/coming-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antonolsen.com/2005/04/10/coming-soon/</link>
	<description>Making Mistakes as Fast as I Can.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:53:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rattus</title>
		<link>http://antonolsen.com/2005/04/10/coming-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>rattus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 23:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonolsen.com/?p=30#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Great idea for the shuffle! The &quot;sort&quot; might or should be &quot;sort -n&quot;, at least for consistency. BTW, I compared your shuffle() with a simple perl script using mainly &quot;splice(@array, rand @array, 1)&quot;. The perl shuffles 40k lines in 0.5 seconds whereas your shuffle() takes 8.2 seconds on a 2.4 GHz Xeon. Of course, the difference is of less importance when the number of lines is lower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea for the shuffle! The &#8220;sort&#8221; might or should be &#8220;sort -n&#8221;, at least for consistency. BTW, I compared your shuffle() with a simple perl script using mainly &#8220;splice(@array, rand @array, 1)&#8221;. The perl shuffles 40k lines in 0.5 seconds whereas your shuffle() takes 8.2 seconds on a 2.4 GHz Xeon. Of course, the difference is of less importance when the number of lines is lower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
